Until this past season, he was on a Damian Lillard-led team focused on winning rather than the development of young players.Īfter Lillard left the 2021-22 rotation with an abdominal injury, though, Little averaged 13.1 points and 2.1 threes while shooting 40.3 percent from deep. Taking a player with a career scoring average of 5.8 in the top 25 may feel like a bit of a stretch, but Nassir Little hasn't had many opportunities to show off his offense. With an obvious edge in playmaking potential, Alexander-Walker gets the nod.Ģ7. Alexander-Walker more than doubles Reddish's assist rate, though, and he generally brings more pop off the dribble. In terms of points per possession and effective field-goal percentage, Nickeil Alexander-Walker's scoring profile isn't much different than Reddish's. Nickeil Alexander-Walker (Originally Picked 17th) Having a gap-filler like Konchar, even if he's about as good as he'll ever get, can go a long way toward adding up wins.Ģ8. He's also hit 40.6 percent of his three-point attempts.īasketball is a team sport, and volume-scoring upside isn't necessarily what you want at all five spots. Konchar is in the top 80 among all NBA players in box plus/minus over the course of his career, with well-rounded averages of 10.3 points, 8.8 rebounds, 3.1 assists, 1.4 threes and 1.4 steals per 75 possessions. John Konchar doesn't have the raw scoring average or predraft hype of Reddish, but his advanced numbers suggest he should be much higher than 29th here. Still, the physical profile of a prototypical three-and-D wing, and the fact that he's only 22 makes Reddish worth a re-draft flier. Among the 49 who've taken at least 100 shots-not including undrafted players-he's 43rd in effective field-goal percentage. Reddish has played only 133 regular-season games in his career, and he ranks 55th among players drafted in 2019 in wins over replacement player. But there's actually a case to have him out of the top 30 altogether. Nassir Little (Steph Chambers/Getty Images)Ĭam Reddish has averaged double-figures in each of his three seasons, and he offered a glimpse of hope for his outside shooting with a 35.9 three-point percentage in 2021-22. With all of the above tossed into something of an analytical cocktail, this is how the first round should shake out if it was re-drafted today (assuming an order of 30 generic teams, not the original order from 2019).Ĭheck out B/R's other NBA re-drafts here: 2016, 2017, 2018 ![]() Three years ago, the idea of positionless basketball (and by extension, the importance of wings) may not have been quite as prevalent as it is now. Sorting through everyone requires a lot of judgments calls.Įvolutions in the game of basketball have to be considered, too. So, there's a lot of subjectivity in play as well. These players are all still in their early- to mid-20s, theoretically pre-prime. With that extra information in hand, we'll re-draft the first 30 picks from 2019, but the order won't be entirely based on past production. ![]() ![]() If teams knew then what they know, the first round would've gone much differently. ![]() Today's media landscape demands instant analysis of the NBA draft, but it takes time to have a clear idea of how every team did.įor the 2019 draft class, we now have three seasons from which to draw some takes.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |